Information Please---PP256 vs. 250 EX

[Kempy]

A-T-O-M
I have both 250EX and 255EXT the 255 is still my favorite so far just find the setting and save it, then go to it anytime no switches or knobs to adjust just push the memory button till all the little lights light up on the one I see I want i don't try to memorize the number just the settings AC, DC, Pulse or just easy setup. Plasma cutter is separate and always ready to go. I just got the I Mig250 to see if I need a none portable machine and I like it now I have a big collection of Everlast Machines and having a hard time deciding on which one to sell probably the 250EX but I do like it. What ever machine or machines you buy you will like them.
GOOD LUCK

[everlastsupport]

A-T-O-M

I have the 250EX and the 255EXT. Either are a great pick. I like the 250EX since I can see the knobs. Getting used to the 255EXT, start amps get me every time and once it flipped to AC on me before I caught it. I have a PP50 and PP80 plasma, I think the PP50 would please about anyone. I have used the MIG200, 205P and 250P.

Like Kempy said, you will like whatever you get.

But unless I was short on space or cash, I would go for better a duty cycle welder and a PP50. The 256 is a lighter duty machine, more hobby or occasional work/fixes. Not knocking it, just biased. And the 250EX is still a GREAT machine for the money.

[DaveO]

The 256 is a lighter duty machine

The specs show the 256 at 35% duty cycle; the 250EX is a workhorse at 60%. If you're looking at production work, and keeping customers happy, sure seems like more duty cycle would be the way to go.

[A-T-O-M]

The specs show the 256 at 35% duty cycle; the 250EX is a workhorse at 60%. If you're looking at production work, and keeping customers happy, sure seems like more duty cycle would be the way to go.

Yes, I expect that you are correct. I hate doing something more than once. I tend to be a little anal about doing things right the first time.....so, I take my time with decisions trying to make everything fit within my parameters. It is usually a lost cause...


I know I "need" a plasma cutter, probably as bad as I "need" the AC/DC machine....hence my indecision. I won't need the cooler because I have an older Miller that can be rebuilt/re-purposed. Still, .....

Anyway, I would still like to hear from anyone about the 256 as far as improvements or mods in the last couple of years. Seems like everything on here that speaks to fitness of purpose, reliability, usage, etc., etc., is all an older timeframe--a lot of the stuff is several years old. Have there been any important mods done on the 256 recently?? Or is it the same old tired (3-4 y.o.) machine??

Thanks DaveO, Kempy, Support Guy Mike.....and everyone else too!!

[DaveO]

Can't speak to improvements or mods to the PP256. Did your requirements change? Your original post mentioned working on "fairly heavy" aluminum plate. The 250 EX welds to 1/2" aluminum, according to the specs; the 256 welds to about 3/8" and cuts to 3/4". Maybe the 256 would work for you if the plate doesn't exceed 3/8" and the welds per piece are brief. But... with the multi-purpose if for some reason the machine has to return for service, then you've lost both functions. Cool to have a sideline business that bankrolls your interests/hobbies... maybe use proceeds to buy a plasma cutter?

[A-T-O-M]

Thanks Dave O for reminding me to READ the spec sheet instead of just glancing at it.!!

I saw the 1/2 inch spec. on the 256 and assumed it was the same as the 250EX.....Well, of course it isn't. The steel side is the same (except for the duty cycle..) but the Al. side says decrease by 30%....which I would have seen if I had READ the specs instead of......well, you know..... So now I am assuming that the AC side of the machine is somehow limited in comparison to the 250EX....could be just the duty cycle causing it I guess.

And No, my "requirements" haven't really changed. I don't really NEED the extra capability for heavy aluminum, just could use it for certain jobs IF I had it available. Most of the heavier plate in question is 3/8 with some 1/2 inch thrown in. So, it certainly merits consideration. Anyway, I appreciate the "heads-up" on the specs. If not for that I would still be cruising along thinking I knew what I was talking about!!