Dave, I think there may be forces at play that keep mixed gasses mixed and not let them separate out immediately (at least to some degree.)
If the components in air separated out very quickly/readily, wouldn't we only get to breathe the densest contents (IE: argon) down at sea level? Anyhow, my neutral buoyancy theory should be something that I might be able to test. Here is something I just noticed - ck worldwide's guide to shielding gas flows recommendation chart, says 30% or less Helium (/Argon) mixes can use the same flow rate as for pure Argon:
http://www.ckworldwide.com/tech-3.pdf
(Kind of interesting they picked 30% as the cutoff point...)
I'm excited because I'm up and running with not only a fresh argon bottle, but I also now have a "Y" setup. I've tried it so far, just flowing gas out of the torch (haven't done any arc tests yet), and so far so good. Both floating balls respond instantly when the gas solenoid opens, and adjusting one of the gas flows does not impact the flowrate of the other - perfect. I incorporated 1/4" NPT fittings into the "Y" connection, so I may be able to add checkvalves on later if desired. I put a standard outlet fitting (5/8-18 flare I believe) on the outlet of the "Y", so I can connect the same hose that connects direct to a regulator to the outlet of the "Y" (or back the other direction) as needed. (This was easier said than done... I had to weld two brass fittings together to make it happen!) Good stuff.
![]()
Edit: I just did some quick tests on various He/Ar mixes, run back to back. 0% He, 33% He, 66% He, 100% He, then repeated the sequence again, and a few other things. Just small 1" long beads run on 1/16" flat stock with 1/16" filler rod. I found something interesting only on the pure (100%) He, the glow of the arc was actually red in the middle, just off the tungsten. Around the red glowing zone, it had the normal green glow. On all other mixes, the arc didn't have the red glow at all, it was only the usual green. (This is though my auto-darkening lens, of course.) Pretty cool.
I did all my test with 20% EP (minimum AC Balance my machine goes to), and it seems the 33%-66% He mixes could be useful in reducing the ethed zone while still providing some necessary cleaning. The 100% He had oxides in the puddle and a "crazed" cathodic etch pattern in the surfaces around the weld bead. I used 15 total cfh for most of the tests, but I did try boosting the cfh with heavy He concentrations to improve cleaning (I think I boosted it to 20cfh, which didn't seem to do much; maybe I need to boost to something crazier, like 30cfh.) This is with a #5, non-gas lens cup. I wasn't finding any evidence of smut or soot (of any kind) on any of these tests. I'm really glad I have the ability to vary the mix, and didn't get a pre-mixed bottle, this is cool.Oh yeah back to back going from He mixes back to pure argon, definite increase in the amount of foot pedal depression to get a puddle. I was using a 1/16" tungsten.
There is a definite difference in noise of the He vs the Ar (as well as any major change in the relative mix) coming out of the TIG torch cup. In fact, after I vary the mix, I can hear it when the new gas mix starts making its way out of the TIG torch. (Doesn't take long for the new mix to get to the cup, about 2 seconds with my setup, I'd say.) Different noise the gases make "whistling" or "hissing" out of the cup, (or through the orifices in the collet body, perhaps.)